« Primary democracy | Main | Greek Revival »

After Randall v. Sorrell

Duke Law Professor Walter Dellinger, a former acting Solicitor General, writes in writes in Slate that the Supreme Court's decisions this term on election law suggest reformers should be looking away from expenditure limits.

Give every registered voter a voucher for a few hundred dollars (or a few thousand—this would still be a bargain) to be used for whatever state, local, or federal candidate the citizen wished to support. She would send in her voucher to her favorite campaign, which would submit it to the U.S. Treasury for payment. There would be no limits on private spending, but its influence would be greatly diminished by the flood of everyone's money.

Bill Corbett

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834204fbb53ef00d8352faa6c53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference After Randall v. Sorrell:

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment