Our year-end report, "Neighbor Helping Neighbor: Study Circles in Manassas/Prince William," can be downloaded in full by clicking here. (PDF, 26pp.) Below is its Executive Summary. Thank you to everyone who made our first year so fruitful. We look forward to working again with you in 2009-10.
Scroll down to the next post to sign up for our new e-newsletter. It will report on circle activities in your
neighborhood and in neighborhoods nearby and around Manassas, Manassas
Park and Prince William County.
Executive Summary
Study Circles are groups of 8-15 people who meet for up to six two-hour sessions led by two facilitators. Through trust-building exercises and dialogue, participants connect with each other, gain a greater understanding of issues and develop action plans.
Section 1: Why Bring Study Circles to Manassas/Prince William. The goals of the circles are: to build relationships and understanding between diverse neighbors, to find common ground on the issues facing the neighborhood and to develop and implement action plans that will improve the neighborhood for all residents.
Section 2: Process and Outcome of the Circles. A pilot circle with 14 participants was held at George Mason University, followed by seven circles in these city/county neighborhoods: Weems (7 participants), Wildwood (16), Georgetown South (15), Wellington (12), Point of Woods/Cannon Ridge (11), Lindendale (7) and West Gate (4). Dialogue and action ideas surrounded these seven themes: Attacking apathy - block events/neighborhood pride campaign; Communication - neighborhood info exchange/informing City Council/BOCS; Put in the time to fight crime - strengthening Neighborhood Watch/National Night Out; Neighbors helping neighbors – foreclosures/unemployed/seniors; Assimilating immigrants – women’s circles, language translation services; Involving youth – mentoring, activities, neighborhood job opportunities and Protecting housing stock - volunteer construction/maintenance projects.
Section 3. Circle Evaluations. Of the 86 people who participated in the circles, 39 returned their evaluations. Thirty-six rated the program as “very good” or “good” and “strongly agreed” or “agreed” they would tell a friend to participate in a circle. Only one of 39 said she would not tell a friend to participate in a circle.
Section 4: Action Forum. Organizers brought together all circle participants for a half-day forum at George Mason University. Thirty-nine participants attended. Results included: Formation of action groups/community partners; further identification of Week of Hope projects; a contact list to launch a neighborhood e-newsletter, and a waiting list of future circles.
Section 5: Success Stories. Actions taken in the neighborhoods since the circles met are detailed, and include a local church’s “tool drive” for youth in Georgetown South and a sharing agreement on pool privileges between two HOAs.
Section 6: Facilitator Recommendations. Facilitators recommend the circles continue and expand to all neighborhoods with a greater commitment by participants to attend all six sessions and more diversity in participants. The circles should be planned to take place before annual HOA meetings and town hall meetings in neighborhoods. This report should be shared with Manassas Park and Prince William County to encourage their participation and support, as well as to encourage school and church-based circles. The information should be shared regionally with other jurisdictions working on the same challenges.